Manual VDA 6.5 - 2020
Manual VDA 6.5 - 2020
Product Audit
Guideline
Copyright 2020 by
Overall Production:
Henrich Druck + Medien GmbH
Schwanheimer Straße 110, 60528 Frankfurt am Main
Exclusion of liability
This VDA QMC document is a recommendation that is free for anyone to use. Users
are responsible for the correct application of the recommendations from case to
case.
This document takes account of the state of knowledge and technology prevailing at
the time of the respective issue. The use of the guideline does not absolve anyone of
responsibility for his/her own actions. In this regard, each one acts on his/her own
responsibility. Liability on the part of the VDA/VDA QMC and those involved in the
preparation of these recommendations is excluded.
Copyright protection
This document is protected by copyright. Any use outside the strict limits of the
copyright laws without the permission of the VDA is prohibited and punishable by
law. This applies in particular to reproductions, translations, microfilming, and
storage and processing in electronic systems.
Translations
This document will also be published in other languages.
Please contact VDA QMC for the most current respective status.
Table of contents
1 Preface 7
4 Audit program 13
4.1 Input criteria for determining the audit program 16
4.2 Specifications of the audit program 18
4.3 Scope of an audit program 22
4.4 Implementation of the audit program 22
4.5 Monitoring and evaluation of the audit program 23
5 Audit plan 24
5.1 Inspection characteristics and specifications 25
5.2 Test equipment and number of parts to be tested 25
5.3 Specifications for controlling the test parts 26
5.3.1 Parts removal 26
5.3.2 Parts labeling 26
5.3.3 Transport and packaging of parts 27
5.3.4 Return of products 27
5.4 Reference documents 27
7 Audit report 31
7.1 Notes on the classification of deviations
and their evaluation 32
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 07.07.2020 um 11:35
10 Reference documents 37
1 Preface
Since the second edition was published in 2008, the conditions for automotive
manufacturers and suppliers to the automotive industry have changed rapidly.
Automotive-specific requirements with international validity, such as IATF 16949,
form the basis for action for quality management in the automotive industry.
Based on the experience gained during the introduction of the IATF requirements,
the differentiation between the terms “product audit” and “layout inspection”
allows for various interpretations. This volume provides a recommendation for a
differentiation.
The new edition is based on the up to date requirements of ISO 19011 „Guidelines
for auditing management systems“.
This third edition of VDA Volume 6 Part 5 – Product Audit – replaces the second
edition from 2008.
VDA 6 VDA 6 QM-System Audit VDA 6 QM-System Audit VDA 6 QM-System Audit
Part 1 Part 2 Services Part 4 Production
Serial Production
Certification Equipment
requirements for
VDA 6.1
VDA 6.2 VDA 6 Process Audit VDA 6 Process Audit
VDA 6.4 Part 3 Part 7
Serial Production and Services Production
Equipment
2 Purpose and
area of application
Product audits serve as a management tool for the independent evaluation of
products from the customer‘s perspective (both internal and external) and identify
any potential for continuous improvement.
During product audits, the specified product properties and requirements (e.g.
conformity with the parts list, product dimensions, material, functionality, reliability,
packaging, marking) as well as known customer expectations are determined in a
certain product condition (e.g. packed, ready for delivery, after use).
• assembly parts
e.g. electronic components, control units, transmissions, bodies,
complete vehicles
The distinction of the product audit from other tests is also shown in the subse-
quent table 1.
This guideline describes the area of application of the product audit and provides
suggestions for the management of an audit program.
Main areas of complaints and quality trends may be identified by regular product
audits. If applicable, weak points in the system or process can be traced back and
the implementation of further audits, such as process and system audits, can be
derived.
Content/Purpose The purpose of a product audit may be the following: • Process control (e.g. process • Requirement IATF 16949:
• Requirement of IATF 16949 parameters, SPC, tensile Complete dimensional6 and function
• Evaluation of product quality according to an strength, torques, material and test7 in consideration of the applicable
internal quality standard that fulfills at least the electrical characteristics, joints, customer requirements for material and
customer´s requirements micrograph analyses) function specified in the control plans
• Identification of potential improvements • Evidence of compliance with • Layout inspection and functional testing
• Assessment of the product from the customer's specified product characteristics of the product:
perspective (internal/external) • Evidence management of Complete validation of all product
• Evidence of reliability requirements product liability cases approval requirements
• Evidence of interplay of product characteristics see also VDA 2 – (PPA) and/or PPAP
(functional testing)
• Evidence of characteristics that are not covered in
the control plan 3
• Evidence of compliance with product
characteristics that may influence customer
satisfaction 4
Table 1: Distinction of the product audit from other tests
1 Results of the product audit can be used for proof of layout inspection and functional testing.
2 Test parts of a layout inspection and functional testing can be used for a product audit (e.g. reliability test can be carried out of individual components after a measure and function test).
3
Not all product characteristics are examined in the control plan. This may be because there is no requirement from an FMEA or due to a lack of economical test methods.
4 Customer relevance; subjective perception of product specified characteristics
5 For example, a specific characteristic is the volume flow, via the pressure equivalent a test is made in series.
Note: Scope of layout inspection and functional testing has to be agreed between customer and organization, according to VDA 2 Production Process and Product Approval (PPA).
Purpose and area of application 11
12 3 Product audit sequence
This diagram shows the individual steps of a product audit. For better orientation,
the chapter covered is marked in yellow on the following pages.
Audit plan 3
Audit plan 2
Audit plan 1
Chap.
5
Execution of
Chap. 6
product audits
Initiation of
Chap. 8
audit follow-up actions
4 Audit program
Audit plan 3
Audit plan 2
Execution of
Chap. 6
product audits
Initiation of
Chap. 8
audit follow-up actions
The audit program of product audits contains all activities that are necessary for
planning, organization, and execution in order to carry out the planned audits
efficiently and effectively within the given time frame. This also includes the
provision of human and testing resources.
Responsibility for the audit program lies with the person in charge of quality
management. Dokument wurde bereitgestellt vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 07.07.2020 um 11:35
Product Product Part Responsible for Audit objective Resources Responsible Target date References
groups designation number(s) product
Customer end Y Series YP14xx Letsche Inspection of the interior 3 vehicles, 8 person days Mayer 02/28 Summary of customer
Table 2: Example audit program
product (e.g. comfort functions after development and quality satisfaction survey from
complete major software update previous year
vehicle) Index D according to
Instruction B13
Assembly 1.6 TD 77 kW L1234; L1280; Meier Confirmation of required 5 units, 8 person days test Karl 01/15 Test instruction DAHBA 1
parts (e.g. L1281 durability facility, 800 h test bench AP
units)
2.0 TD 90 kW M5678 Schulz Review of customer 2 units, 2 person days test Karl 05/30 Customer satisfaction report
complaints about facility, 2 days sound measuring IBT 15, "Trade Press" report
excessive noise levels in chamber, 2 days mobile test M5678AA
the full load range and bench MAP
identification of the
cause
Individual RA 12 mm series 12124- Schmitt Fulfillment of durability 30 parts, 4 person days test Mayer 04/30 Spec. DH12, drawing
parts 12254 requirements & drawing facility, 100 h test bench 2, 10 h
(e.g. bearing dimensions CMM
bushes)
…..
The structure of the audit program must be adapted to the respective product
portfolio of the organization, (e.g. individual parts, assembly parts or customer final
product).
• internal specifications
• test reports
• strategic importance of the product, opportunities and risks for the organization
• changes of machines/equipment
• product variants
The objectives for the respective product audits derived from the input criteria
Product groups
responsible for
Part number(s)
designation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Product
product
Person
Yes/No
should be used as input variables for the creation of the audit program and the
1,3,9
1,3,9
1,3,9
1,3,9
1,3,9
1,3,9
1,3,9
1,3,9
1,3,9
1,3,9
1,3,9
Info Info Info Info Info Info Info Info Info Info Info
audit plans, for selecting auditors, for determining the scope of the audit, etc.
Table 3 shows an example of how a matrix can be used to evaluate different criteria
L1234;
and thereby prioritize product audits. 1.6 TD 77kW L1280; Meier 3
Standard
product
3
Some goodwill
claims
1 normal 3 average risks 3
Minor defects
in ET
3
Smooth
running, sound
3 1 12 ppm 1 1 1 23 Yes
L1281;
Discontinued Smooth
Units
1.9 T FDQI M1050 Schulz 1 1 normal 1 normal 3 average risks 1 No complaints 3 1 1 0 ppm 1 1 1 15 No
model running, sound
Complete vehicles
Completely new Cooperation of
Customer
Software line in hardware &
Complaints expects High-quality
Failure codes conversion Audit not yet assembly, software of comfort
Y Series YP14xx Letsche 9 Image carrier 3 3 about comfort 9 9 9 impression of 3 product, low 3 9 1 9 67 Yes
in memory identified as carried out machining, and functions difficult to
functions maximum quantities
problematic at supplier test during
quality
locations production process
Bearing bushes BA
1st
RA 12mm 12124- application Audit not yet New machining
Schmitt 9 1 normal 1 none yet 3 average risks 9 1 3 9 3% rejects 3 9 New patent 1 49 Yes
series 12254 new carried out center
generation
….. …….
* Explanation of Table 3:
In the examples shown, all input criteria were rated equally, and prioritization was carried out by adding the ratings.
The
Tab. rating
3: can beofadapted
Example a decision to theforspecific
matrix company,
determining or additional input criteria can be integrated.
the audit program
4.3 Scope of an audit program 4.5 Monitoring and evaluation of the audit program
In consideration of the input criteria, the following should be specified in the The implementation of the audit program must be monitored and evaluated at
audit program: appropriate intervals and reported to the responsible bodies (e.g. in the manage-
ment review).
• products from the product portfolio to be audited.
• audit objectives/scope as contents of the audit plan The evaluation of the audit program should take the following into account:
• responsibilities (e.g. the creator of the audit plan) • input criteria for the audit program
• start of the first product audit (e.g. preseries phase) • achievement of targets
• The audit program is announced, and the audits are coordinated and
scheduled.
5 Audit plan
Audit plan 3
Audit plan 2
Audit plan 1
Chap.
5
Execution of
Chap. 6
product audits
Initiation of
Chap. 8
audit follow-up actions
The audit plan derived from the audit program describes all activities and resour-
ces required for the execution of a product audit, as well as the time and sample
size. Moreover, the test method and test equipment used to test the product
characteristics are determined in the scope of inspection planning.
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 07.07.2020 um 11:35
• material
• dimensions
• functionality (electric/mechanical)
• software quality
• connectivity
• packaging
• corrosion resistance
• temperature behavior
Failure catalogs/limit samples agreed with the customer must be used when
inspecting attribute characteristics. In order to keep the standard for evaluation
consistent and constant, a regular evaluation comparison must be carried out.
• production volume
• production complexity
• process controllability
The designation of a product as a test part must not be recognizable for the
production area until it is removed.
Products removed for product audits must have passed the planned tests in the
process, such as intermediate tests, construction progress tests and final tests,
without any faults and therefore be in a condition ready for handover or delivery.
• standards
• test specifications
• FMEAs
• failure catalogs
• boundary samples
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 07.07.2020 um 11:35
• assessment/quality
6 Execution of
product audits
Audit plan 3
Audit plan 2
Execution of
Chap. 6
product audits
Initiation of
Chap. 8
audit follow-up actions
Product audits are conducted according to the specifications in the audit plan by
specially trained auditors (see Chapter 9 Qualification of product auditors). In an
audit, relevant departments are informed about the removal of products to allow
the production quantities to be adjusted where necessary.
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 07.07.2020 um 11:35
If the audit is conducted for a current reason (e.g. complaint), the batch from
which the parts were removed can be withheld until the audit is completed.
Chap. 6 Execution of
product audits
Notification of
a relevant departments
Removal of parts
b from the production
process
c Labeling of
the parts
Documentation
e of the results
7 Audit report
Audit plan 3
Audit plan 2
Audit plan 1
Chap.
5
Chap. 6 Execution of
Product audits
Chap. 8 Initiation of
audit follow-up actions
• major defect A
• major defect B
• minor defect C
8 Initiation of audit
follow-up actions
Audit plan 3
Audit plan 2
Audit plan 1
Chap.
5
Chap. 6 Execution of
Product audits
Chap. 8 Initiation of
audit follow-up actions
Generally, the quality management system should specify the procedures for
managing measures for deviations.
9 Qualification of
product auditors
The qualification of the auditors must be geared towards the fulfillment of this job
profile.
Qualification Examples
Training – training in a specific profession
Specialist – experience in manufacturing
requirements – product, manufacturing, and process knowledge
– use of the audited product
– testing technology
– measuring technology
– basic terms of Q-methodology
– knowledge about complaints
– knowledge about customer requirements on the product
– report generation
– evaluation of products based on product-specific
requirements (evaluation standards)
– foreign language skills (if necessary)
Personal qualities – social skills
– objectivity
– physical aptitude, e.g. eye test
– personal reliability
The product auditors must also be compared on a regular basis as part of the
qualification process. This applies especially in the case of multiple production
sites with comparable products within a single organization with regard to the use
of failure catalogs/complaint classifications.
10 Reference documents
This volume takes the requirements from the following documents into
account:
11 Definition of
terms and glossary
Product
In distinction to standard ISO 9000 (Section 3.7.6), this volume treats products in
the following product categories:
A product (e.g. complete vehicle) may also comprise a combination of the above
components.
EMV
Electromagnetic compatibility
ESD
Electrostatic discharge
CoP
CoP is the abbreviation for „Conformity of Production“, i.e. the conformity of
production with the legal requirements.
1)
Layout inspection (IATF 16949) is the complete measurement of all product dimensions shown on the design
record(s).
2)
Functional testing (IATF 16949) includes testing of customer requirements for function, durability and material
characteristics.
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 07.07.2020 um 11:35
You can find the current status of the published VDA volumes on Quality Management in the
Automotive Industry (QAI) in the Internet at http://www.vda-qmc.de.
Reference:
Verband der Automobilindustrie e.V. (VDA)
Qualitäts Management Center (QMC)
Behrenstraße 35, 10117 Berlin
Telephone +49 (0) 30 8978 42-235,
Fax +49 (0) 30 8978 42-605
E-Mail: info@vda-qmc.de, Internet: www.vda-qmc.de
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 07.07.2020 um 11:35
Product Audit
Guideline